Currently, ProcessGDBRemote::DoAllocateMemory calls InferiorCallMmap (probably as a fallback option). Is this OK (even as a fallback)? I ask this because mmap is a very POSIXey thing. If it is not OK, what is the right thing to do here? Should we be creating an abstraction for a platform specific memory allocation function, or should this fallback not exist at all (meaning that remote memory allocation should only be done via an _M packet)?
Thanks, Siva Chandra _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
