> On Jan 26, 2015, at 3:28 PM, Oleksiy Vyalov <ovya...@google.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm trying to make TestProcessAttach to pass in case of remote platform. I > see a few problems here: > • lldbtest.spawnSubprocess should spawn a new process remotely (e.g., > using A packet) when remote_platform is presented. > • It seems "process attach" doesn't know about selected platform and > tries to find a local process to attach - either by pid or name (I don't see > qLaunchGDBServer requests in platform's gdb-remote logs). > The main question for me here - is it expected behavior that "process > attach|launch" always work with local processes only regardless of selected > platform? Or if it's not the case should we delegate Process::Attach call to > Platform::Attach and Process::Launch to Platform::ProcessLaunch? > Or as minimal workaround make TestProcessAttach to use "platform process > attach" command instead?
Yes, use the "platform process attach" command, or better yet add new API to SBPlatform: SBProcess SBPlatform::Launch (SBLaunchInfo &launch_info, SBError& error); SBProcess SBPlatform::Attach (SBAttachInfo &attach_info, SBError& error); Then we can use this API to do the launching/attaching via the SBPlatform object we already have stored. Greg _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev