We currently assume UTF8 and those strings are NULL terminated. > On Feb 25, 2015, at 4:20 AM, Vince Harron <vhar...@google.com> wrote: > > Well those single byte characters will be UTF8 encoded so I don't think null > in the string will happen legally. > > On Feb 25, 2015 1:08 AM, <d...@burble.org> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 05:42:00AM +0000, Zachary Turner wrote: > > ... supporting Unicode > > strings is something we should do someday, so we shouldn't make our future > > work more difficult? > > yes, pretty please? :) > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
