> On Feb 26, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > > Thanks, that's a good idea. I don't plan to start thinking about this soon > btw, mostly just curious so I have a mental roadmap. > > Do you have any thoughts on specifying the minimum required SWIG version as > 3.0?
We don't do that if it is GPLv3. We are stuck with what we have currently: % swig -version SWIG Version 1.3.40 _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
