Thanks for the insight. On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:07 PM, <jing...@apple.com> wrote:
> A lot of these aliases were added to emulate the associated gdb commands, > in order to make the transition easier for gdb users. So in this case, > because run is "process launch --" you can launch your program and pass the > arguments "-foo -bar -baz" to your program by doing: > > (lldb) run -foo -bar -baz > > which pretty much what you would do in gdb. So having the -- in the alias > is necessary to produce the intended behavior. > > Since, if you don't like run the way it is, you can easily unalias it in > your .lldbinit and re-alias it to whatever you want, it doesn't bother me > that the built-in alias presents a reduced but more familiar view of the > command. > > Jim > > > On Mar 25, 2015, at 2:57 PM, Adrian McCarthy <amcca...@google.com> > wrote: > > > > I looking at bug 22968 and trying to figure out if there's a bug here or > not. > > > > The `run` command alias ends with `--`, so there doesn't seem to be a > way to specify options when using the alias. For example, if you do: > > > > (lldb) run -s > > > > That's treated as though you wrote: > > > > (lldb) process launch -c<shell-path> -- -s > > > > The `-s` argument is placed after the `--`, which causes it to be passed > on to the inferior and not treated as an option to the `process launch` > command. That's consistent but possibly surprising behavior. If you > wanted the `-s` on the command, you'd have to spell it out explicitly: > > > > (lldb) process launch -c<shell-path> -s > > > > Should there be an alias that doesn't end in `--`? > > > > Thanks, > > Adrian McCarthy > > _______________________________________________ > > lldb-dev mailing list > > lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
