To tell the truth, I've never looked at the implementation of this too closely, but it does seem to work. You have to use the -t option if you are going to do any complex logging since you will probably get multiple threads logging simultaneously.
Jim > On May 6, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Vince Harron <vi...@nethacker.com> wrote: > > I've never tried logging to the same file because I stepped through the code > and (IIRC) different "log enable" commands to the same file path open > separate file descriptors without the append flag, so I expected that they > would stomp on each other. Maybe I misunderstood. I'll try it now. > > > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Sean Callanan <scalla...@apple.com> wrote: > I’ve never wanted to send different logs to different files. > > Sean > > > On May 6, 2015, at 4:19 PM, Vince Harron <vi...@nethacker.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Greg/all, > > > > I would like to add a feature to the log system that allows multiple > > channels to write to a single file. This will be incredibly useful for > > correlating messages between channels. We can also add a log option for > > adding the channel name to each log line, which would allow filtering based > > on channel name. > > > > Do you want to retain the ability to log different channels to separate > > files? > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Vince > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lldb-dev mailing list > > lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
