On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Vince Harron <vi...@nethacker.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > Before you move them, can you explain what experimental means? > The significant thing to be, according to Galina, is that such a buildbot won't send fail-mail to everyone on the blame list when it fails. > The Linux builder does have some flakey builds and I'm working on that > right now. > > I'm one test away from getting OSX green. I would like to see how it does. > Seems fine - but I'd be happy to have it in experimental first, you can fix it, wait to see a consistently good non-flaky behavior, then move it over. > We are doing a bringup on the android builder right now, it makes sense to > move that somewhere else. > > Also, it would be very much appreciated to include lldb-dev when > discussing lldb issues. > > Thanks, > > Vince > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >Perhaps everything should go in experimental first & only moved out once >> they've got a track record of success. >> Yes, this is good idea. I will move them to experimental. >> >> Thanks >> >> Galina >> >> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:45 AM, David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Ed Maste <ema...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On 11 May 2015 at 22:52, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > Hello everyone, >>>> > >>>> > I'm not sure I follow the discussion. >>>> > >>>> > Which builder are we talking about? Is it lldb-x86_64-freebsd? >>>> >>>> A few different things are being discussed in this thread. >>>> lldb-x86_64-freebsd is the specific one of interest to me, but the >>>> lldb builders are in general unreliable. >>>> >>>> > There were 3 failure e-mail notifications related to this particular >>>> builder >>>> > during the last month. The last notification looks valid, since the >>>> build >>>> > went from green to red >>>> > (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-freebsd/builds/5589 >>>> vs. >>>> > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-freebsd/builds/5588). >>>> >>>> That green-to-red is almost certainly general flakiness, not directly >>>> related to the changes in build 5589. >>>> >>>> > ... >>>> > Or we are talking about all the builders in the whole "lldb" >>>> category? If >>>> > so, let's agree on how it should behave from the notification >>>> perspective, >>>> > and I'll configure it to do so. >>>> > >>>> > In general, any unreliable builder should be in the "experimental" >>>> category. >>>> > These are not sending notifications at all. >>>> >>>> It seems the unreliability / flakiness applies to all of the lldb >>>> builders, other than the Windows ones which only build-test. Does it >>>> make sense to apply the experimental category to all of them for now? >>>> >>> >>> Perhaps everything should go in experimental first & only moved out once >>> they've got a track record of success. (& I wouldn't mind bumping a lot of >>> existing builders back down to that category) >>> >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> llvm-commits mailing list >>>> llvm-comm...@cs.uiuc.edu >>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits >>>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> llvm-commits mailing list >> llvm-comm...@cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits >> >> >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
