ThreadList::WillResume, near the bottom, ends up calling ShouldResume(eStateSuspended) on the other threads, because the ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::StopOthers says it should.
Thread::ShouldResume effectively passes its parameter on to the thread's WillResume, with the comment, "Let Thread subclasses do any special work they need to prior to resuming." On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:29 PM Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > >> I'm not quite ready to throw the blanket over this one yet :) >> >> What was the value of resume_state when it called WillResume()? It >> sounds like it was eStateSuspended, which if that's the case, then it still >> seems like something deeper inside of LLDB's thread plans is confused about >> something, because calling WillResume(eStateSuspended) means "The process >> is seriously about to resume, and when it does, this thread is not going to >> remain suspended". >> > > s/is not going to/is going to/ >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
