On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Jim Ingham <jing...@apple.com> wrote:
> That comment is outdated. I don't remember what it was there for > originally, svn says it is Greg's. Maybe he remembers. > Ok, great thanks. I think that comment can be deleted then, so I'll go ahead and do that. > What are you trying to do? > I'm building a different front end on top of LLDB and that comment confused me because it seemed to work fine without, but I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something that would come back to bite me. At the current step, my goal is to run some locally generated IR in the remote process, which I think I now managed to do. > Jim > > > > On Jun 18, 2015, at 10:44 PM, Keno Fischer <kfisc...@college.harvard.edu> > wrote: > > > > In ThreadPlanCallFunction.h I saw > > > > 67 // To get the return value from a function call you must > create a > > 68 // lldb::ValueSP that contains a valid clang type in its > context and call > > 69: // RequestReturnValue. The ValueSP will be stored and when > the function is > > 70 // done executing, the object will check if there is a > requested return > > 71 // value. If there is, the return value will be retrieved > using the > > > > I suspect this comment is just outdated, but is there anything special > that needs to be done in order to be able to get the return value? > > > > Keno > > _______________________________________________ > > lldb-dev mailing list > > lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
