On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Zachary, > > I think the time pressure has gotten the better of me, so I want to > apologize for getting snippy about the static bindings of late. I am > confident we will get to a good solution for removing that dependency, but > I can certainly wait for a solution (using an alternate approach in our > branch) until we arrive at something more palatable to everyone. > > Regarding the bindings as service idea: > > How quickly do you think you could flesh out the bindings as a service > idea? With a relatively strong dislike for the static approach I'm taking, > I can back off that and just use my current code here in a downstream > branch for now. Ultimately I want to remove the requirement for swig, but > I can probably achieve that without doing it in upstream if we're going to > have some solution there at some point ideally sooner than later. > > Also - I think you were going to send me a swig 3.x binding to try out > (I'd need the LLDBWrapPythoh.cpp and the lldb.py, and you'd just need to > let me know if it still needs to be post-processed or it would need to be > done). Can we shoot for trying that out maybe tomorrow? > > Hey I got these, Zachary. They just didn't go in my inbox. > Thanks! > -- > -Todd > -- -Todd
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
