Sounds like you're making some good progress, Kamil! -Todd
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Kamil Rytarowski via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > I ran the LLDB test suite of the LLDB-current version on NetBSD/amd64 > (v. 7.99.21). > > The results are as follows: > > 415 out of 415 test suites processed - TestRecursiveTypes.py > > Ran 415 test suites (266 failed) (64.096386%) > Ran 222 test cases (145 failed) (65.315315%) > Failing Tests (266) > > The major missing piece is native process tracking support (with the > ptrace(2) interface). Once added, LLDB should start to be usable on > this platform. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWZiQdAAoJEEuzCOmwLnZsHNUQALe8F61h9fSyaw0l6nWOIpHs > THgeCWPKMWsf4z82wb4kFWY6TKroUkzl4BiizBUMs+m3fMJLSOMuTp6/kOCOiXM7 > DyRbCkVqXOn/qXg8rocf/mpYmxDRyWM+GcNmwCY/lXp6eYmB67PN4ymxb5mpc1z1 > 27L//+BsKW+EoGT5diTyDzVgpb9U2MZk2nR4lbimuJpmhzEgtFiMLT7GX6BCwoAA > IWCMmO6FKiE5e5PiDoH8j+stMD5+NN2K6l6rS7JrTPdi0TwGSkIH8/DJL5Nob0lv > lyr74B9vVIbsNk4gjzdOgOBOPIt8OVPL4m2GtBQcrCXNbsh88EZnUT+jIHCe3XjT > p8lyrwVrzJBtijlYHJjbyRBzJtUoJ0fVFEiKI/S9Wdki77sQ1Mz48Mfa/+hgrnuW > oc/qUyeNTTj9chjd3NpTQht5H3IF8xDIjqLmLdnYgDwnsZFd8BhHz3QGqbbP0Aa8 > jNy2NCF0+Gog1tF6xSOhBINXFF8qZJOiDOZleUc95wTz+Aw/0NLNqkq9JqPB0s6t > KDM/ykNA0MtJD2b9u8tOFDqVQTJQdiwTKpg6BfdBxBE0R4O9zxb2XjP5fylU+y7Y > TywBSauQ0UnqAe/nXCtWFHFEpzzuNt0D4RWzlO25WaehVbrbC+DyNuC9IKufYiGp > uVIOFiM8loMJFCiQm+DL > =Egm3 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > -- -Todd
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
