Why though? Unless the test explicitly doesn't work on x86 architecture because it uses some unsupported feature, why skip it? If that were truly the reason, then we could just make the entire test suite disable support for i386.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:08 PM Siva Chandra <sivachan...@google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev > <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Why is this marked @skipIfI386? I don't see anything i386 specific about > > this test. Can this decorator be removed? > > I think skipping for i386 is only because most developers are using > 64-bit hosts for development. [Heck, even the bots I think are all > 64-bit hosts. Windows, I am not sure though.] > > I think a more apt decorator would be @skipIfNotHostArch? > > > _______________________________________________ > > lldb-dev mailing list > > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
