https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26790
Bug ID: 26790
Summary: IRForTarget
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: release blocker
Priority: P
Component: All Bugs
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Classification: Unclassified
It looks like the recent changes committed in r260768 have caused regressions
when trying to call functions that take any arguments whose typename is the
result of a `typedef` involving untagged struct types.
e.g
```c++
typedef {
float f;
int i;
} mystruct;
mystruct s;
void somefunc(mystruct *s){}
int $__lldb_expr()
{
;
somefunc(&s);
}
```
lldb versions previous to r260768 resolved the anonymous struct without a
problem, though r260768 and later fail to match the function instead failing
with the following error:
> "error: Couldn't lookup symbols:
> multiply($_0*)
.
It seems that calling functions through pointers returned by
`IRForTarget::ResolveFunctionPointers` has been removed in favor of direct
calls through the function by name. That function previously called
IRForTarget::GetFunctionAddress` to resolve a function, and seems to have had
more robust lookups for matching functions did symbol/type resolution through.
I've attached a diff for a failing testcase, that I think would be helpful to
catch this regression in future. I haven't committed this test to the lldb
source tree yet, as I understand this may unduly upset the buildbots.
Apologies for the delay here, but it was a few days after this change went in
that we got this change locally.
Let me know if there's anything I can do to help test this, as I'm keen to get
this resolved as soon as possible - therwise it seems like the best course of
action is to revert r260768 as it seems there might still be some teething
problems with this commit (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26694
FindCodeSymbolInContext
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
