Adding lldb-dev to the loop. I don't think there should be major issues there as lldb supports a strict subset targets, just making sure everyone is aware of the plans.
Our team manages a couple of lldb buildbots still using cmake 2.8. We'll get started on upgrading them though. pl On 5 May 2016 at 01:08, Galina Kistanova via cfe-dev <cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > This sounds good to me. > I have planned the update. > > Thanks > > Galina > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Mike Edwards via llvm-dev > <llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Chris, >> We have upgrade our bots (both internal and external) to CMake 3.5.2. So >> we are good to go. >> >> -Mike >> >> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Chris Bieneman via llvm-dev >> <llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> Renato, >>> >>> This approach sounds great to me. >>> >>> Chris M let me know separately that GreenDragon is on CMake 3.5. >>> >>> I belive Galina and Takumi maintain the largest chunk of remaining public >>> bots. Do either of you have any thoughts on this? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Chris >>> >>> > On May 3, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Renato Golin <renato.go...@linaro.org> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > On 3 May 2016 at 17:07, Chris Bieneman via cfe-dev >>> > <cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >> Since there seems to be no strong objections remaining I’d like to >>> >> propose the following timeline and process: >>> >> >>> >> 4/23 - I will send another follow-up email reminding everyone of this >>> >> change and timeline >>> >> 4/30 - I will send a final notice an hour before making the change to >>> >> the LLVM, Clang, Compiler-RT, Clang-Tools-Extra, LibCXX, LibCXXABI and >>> >> Test-Suite repos >>> >> >>> >> During the week of 4/30 I will revert as necessary if bots fail. >>> >> Hopefully having the change permanently landed by the middle of the week. >>> >> >>> >> Does this sound agreeable to everyone? >>> > >>> > I'd like to propose a different approach. How about we do this the >>> > other way around? Maybe we should try the "move first, fix later", >>> > than the "break first, despair later". >>> > >>> > This week we (Linaro) have finished our buildbot migration, all of >>> > them running on CMake 3.4.3. I'd like to see if other bot maintainers >>> > could take the same effort before a certain date. >>> > >>> > So, we can still have the same dates (in May, of course), but with >>> > different "labels": >>> > >>> > Soon, you send an announcement: >>> > * Saying the consensus is to move to CMake 3.4.3 as well as a >>> > compiled CMake for all platforms, >>> > * That the technical reason is strong enough to do so, even if it >>> > incurs more work to some people, >>> > * That *ALL* bot owners should migrate as soon as possible (no later >>> > than 30th). >>> > >>> > On 23rd, you send a reminder to the list informing all bot owners that >>> > time is running out. >>> > * If they can't do it, who could help them >>> > * If they need push in the CMake community, or a new stable release, >>> > it's better to have it now than then >>> > >>> > On 30th, you do the migration as you proposed. >>> > >>> > It's all the same, but with the difference that we're involving all >>> > bot owners, and hopefully not having to revert too many times such a >>> > troublesome change (CMake changes always mess up the bots anyway). >>> > >>> > Anyway, for ARM/AArch64, we're good to go. >>> > >>> > cheers, >>> > --renato >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> LLVM Developers mailing list >>> llvm-...@lists.llvm.org >>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-...@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-dev mailing list > cfe-...@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev > _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev