On 13 June 2016 at 18:30, Michael Kuperstein <mku...@google.com> wrote: > It would probably better for whoever wrote this text to pipe in, but I think > the idea is that (X+1).0 is supposed to be a kind of a "bridge" release.
That rings a bell... but I have to be honest, it's weird... Now, well, as Rafael said originally, our policy doesn't state how long we can go (3.10, 3.11 or 3.9 -> 4.0), nor it does *require* that we change the ABI on (X+1). FWIW, the Linux kernel seems to be going that way, too. Whatever works, but it would be good to choose something based on consensus and document. cheers, --renato _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
