>> I think that this is the right approach, and we happen to have a natural >> forcing function here: opaque pointer types. I think we should increment the >> major version number when opaque pointer types are here, as it will be a >> major breaking change, and then we'll have a version 4.0. Until then, unless >> something else breaking comes up, 3.10 sounds fine to me. > +1, complete agreement. Agree
-- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Department of Statistical Modelling, Saint Petersburg State University _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
