I've merged r277997, r277999 and r278001 to 3.9 in r278540. Cheers, Hans
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I do run a basic set of tests (compile+run test suite) on linux from > time to time, but unfortunately I don't have time to be more active in > this. I have just completed the test on the release branch with these > changes cherry-picked and it seems to working fine. But I certainly > agree that the release branch could use more testing. > > Actually, upon closer examination, we should be able to drop one > commit from the list - r278000 - it was just a followup cleanup to the > previous two, and the fourth commit I mentioned still applies cleanly > without it. > > cheers, > pl > > > On 11 August 2016 at 19:41, Hans Wennborg <h...@chromium.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote: >>> On 10 August 2016 at 22:34, Dangling Pointer >>> <danglingpoin...@outlook.com> wrote: >>>> Thanks Pavel! I see the changes made in master branch. >>>> >>>> >>>> By any change can these be back-ported to release38 and 39 branches? Since >>>> llvm38 is the one aports is offering. >>>> >>> >>> I think the 3.8 ship has sailed, but there still may be a chance to >>> get it into 3.9. >>> >>> Hans, what do you make of that? (The relevant changes are r277997, >>> r277999, r278000, r278001) >>> >>> Presumably the right approver would be Oleksiy (also in cc). >> >> The patches seem fine to me. The one thing I'm worried about is >> whether anyone is testing this stuff on the branch? _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev