On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Greg Clayton <clayb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The other thing would be to try and move the demangler to use a custom > allocator everywhere. Not sure what demangler you are using when you are > doing these tests, but we can either use the native system one from > the #include <cxxabi.h>, or the fast demangler in FastDemangle.cpp. If it > is the latter, then we can probably optimize this. > I'm using the demangler I modified here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32500 I think it still starts with FastDemangle.cpp, but one test showed the modified llvm demangler is almost as fast (~1.25% slow down by disabling FastDemangle). I might be able to narrow that further by putting the initial arena on the stack. Now that I moved past the parallelism bottleneck, I think I need to revisit my changes to make sure they're having the desired effect.
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
