FWIW I'm completely on board with everything Adrian has said in this thread :)
-eric On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:00 AM Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev < llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Jan 17, 2018, at 9:20 AM, Jonas Devlieghere via llvm-dev < > llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > As mentioned by Adrian in the comment you linked, I too am looking at > DWARFv5 > > accelerator tables in LLVM. > > > > To give you some background: my motivation is that I want to upstream > support > > for (Apple style) accelerator tables in llvm-dsymutil, > > Some background for the benefit of everyone who may not be aware of the > genesis of the DWARF v5 accelerator tables: > > DWARF v5 accelerator tables are a direct evolution of the "Apple" > accelerator tables that are implemented in LLVM (after going through the > standardization process and being reworked/generalized there), so we hope > that the implementation can at least share some common interfaces with the > existing Apple accelerator table implementation where this makes sense. > > -- adrian > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-...@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
