Hi Pavel, Eugene, here is a testcase that demonstrates the problem. The code
that sets up sigalrm in main() is the same as the program I have been debugging
except that I’ve reduced the interval in this testcase. In the original, as
per the comment, the interval is .8 seconds.
When I run this under macOS lldb it runs to the end and exits normally without
stopping. If I run it under Linux it stops 5 or 6 times with "stop reason =
trace”
I compile with
clang test.c -ldl
on both platforms.
cheers,
--steve
#include <dlfcn.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
static int alarms=0;
void statistics_sigalarm_handler (int x)
{
alarms++;
}
void loadso(char *path)
{
void *handlep;
handlep = dlopen(path, RTLD_LAZY | RTLD_LOCAL);
if (handlep == NULL) {
printf("dlopen failed %s\n", dlerror());
}
}
int main()
{
signal(SIGALRM, statistics_sigalarm_handler);
struct itimerval itimerval;
struct timeval timeval;
timeval.tv_sec = 0;
timeval.tv_usec = 10000; // 8 tenths of a second
itimerval.it_interval = timeval;
itimerval.it_value = timeval;
int r = setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, &itimerval, 0);
if (r) perror("setitimer");
for (int i=0; i<=100; i++) {
#ifdef __APPLE__
loadso(“some_macos_library.dylib");
loadso(“some_other_macos_library.dylib");
#else
loadso(“some_linux_library.so");
loadso(“some_other_linux_library.so");
#endif
}
signal(SIGALRM, SIG_DFL);
printf("Got %d signals\n", alarms);
}
> On Apr 18, 2018, at 6:14 AM, Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +Eugene, who wrote the signal-skipping code
>
> Cool, I'm glad we got to the bottom of this.
>
> At this point, I *think* we should be able to reproduce the issue
> ourselves, but a self-contained reproducer would definitely make it easier
> for us and would be appreciated, particularly as there are still a few
> things I don't understand here (e.g., I think this should only matter only
> after an instruction-step, but your last log seems to show it happens after
> a "continue").
>
> In any case, I do have a couple of follow-up questions:
> - How are you sending the SIGALRM and with what frequency?
> - Are you using SIGALRM on macOS as well (implying we handle it correctly
> there)?
>
> Also, you may know this already, but I feel obligated to point out that
> setting "--pass false" will change the behavior of your program.
>
> cheers,
> pavel
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 at 20:59, Steve Ravet <steve.ra...@apple.com> wrote:
>
>> Ding! That’s it. This program does use SIGALRM. I wouldn’t have
> thought it would be enabled at this point, but apparently it is because I
> got lots of sigalarm halts during the .so loading.
>
>> Further, if I run in lldb with
>
>> process handle -n false -p false -s false SIGALRM
>
>> then the debugger seems to run fine without stopping during dlopen().
> The SIGALRM itself isn’t important to the operation of the program.
>
>> With this knowledge I can probably create a simple testcase. Would this
> be considered an lldb bug? If so should I submit a testcase in some way?
>
>> thanks!
>> --steve
>
>> The lover of nature is he whose inward and outward senses are still
> truly adjusted to each other; who has retained the spirit of infancy even
> into the era of manhood.
>
>
>
>> On Apr 17, 2018, at 1:12 PM, Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> It's a bit of a wild guess, but is it possible that you (or one of the
>> libraries you use) are doing anything with signals (SIGALRM or such?). I
>> think I remember looking at the code handling the server-side ignored
>> signal handling and thinking that it could go wrong if you get a signal
>> while doing a instruction-step. I am not sure it fully applies here as the
>> last command that lldb client did was a "continue", but i think it has to
>> have something to do with signals, as you end up stopped in a signal
>> handler.
>
>> Could you try the following sequence of commands?
>> (lldb) process launch --stop-at-entry-point
>> (lldb) process handle --notify true --stop true #Stop on all signals
>> (lldb) continue
>
>> and let us know if you see any extra stops due to signals. If that doesn't
>> find anything then I think we'll have start pulling logs from the
>> lldb-server side, as there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with the
>> client. The easiest way to achieve that is to do a
>> export LLDB_SERVER_LOG_CHANNELS="posix all:gdb-remote packets"
>> export LLDB_DEBUGSERVER_LOG_FILE=/tmp/server.log
>> before launching lldb.
>> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 at 18:28, Steve Ravet <steve.ra...@apple.com> wrote:
>
>> Pavel asked for a dump of gdb-remote commands. I got that and ran it
>
>> through the gdbremote decoder, and trimmed to include what looks like the
>> last successful continue after breakpoint and then the halt on dlopen.
>> Both cases stop on signal 5.
>
>> After the stop message the debugger issues two binary reads and then
>
>> apparently makes the decision that it should stop rather than continue.
>> The stopping case is missing the equivalent of "Element 1: Single stepping
>> past breakpoint site 2 at 0x2aaaaaab9eb0” which is in the continuing case.
>> I’ve attached the file here:
>
>
>> thanks,
>> --steve
>
>
>
>> From the ashes of disaster grow the roses of success.
>
>
>
>
>> On Apr 17, 2018, at 11:27 AM, Jim Ingham <jing...@apple.com> wrote:
>
>
>> It is interesting that the stop reason on the thread that stopped is
>
>> "trace". That's what you would expect returning from the single-step to
>> step over the breakpoint. But it looks like we got a signal while
>> single-stepping, but the stop reason was misreported by somebody.
>
>> Jim
>
>
>
>> On Apr 17, 2018, at 6:00 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev <
>
>> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> [+lldb-dev]
>
>
>> Hello Steve,
>
>
>> thanks for the report.
>
>
>> The fact that you see the rendezvous breakpoint being hit many times is
>
>> not
>
>> surprising. We get those every time the library is loaded (we need that to
>> load relevant debug info and set potential breakpoints). However, they
>> should generally not be surfaced to the user (unless you have the
>> stop-on-sharedlibrary-events setting set, which you don't).
>
>
>> The part that is suspicious to me is that __restore_rt shows up on the top
>> of the backtrace. This is a trampoline used to return from signal
>
>> handlers,
>
>> and it would seem to indicate that you got some sort of a signal while
>> loading the libraries. I don't know why this would happen, but it could be
>> that this is confusing lldb's auto-resume logic.
>
>
>> The interesting part to see here is what lldb thinks are the stop reasons
>> for individual threads in the process (is the process multi-threaded?) for
>> the last couple of stops. The "lldb step" and "gdb-remote packets" log
>> categories are the most interesting to observe here. If you are able to
>> send me the log traces, I can help you interpret them.
>
>
>> regards,
>> pavel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 at 02:27, Steve Ravet via llvm-dev <
>> llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
>> Hello lldb developers, I am running into a problem with lldb on Linux. I
>
>
>> am currently running llvm 6.0.0.
>
>
>> I have an executable that dynamically loads a large number of shared
>
>
>> libraries at runtime. These are explicitly loaded via dlopen (they are
>> specified in a configuration file), and after loading a few (typically a
>> dozen or so, but the number varies) lldb will halt during dlopen. If I
>> continue, it will load a few more then halt again, which makes debugging
>> from startup impractical since there are so many libraries to be loaded
>> (more than a hundred of them).
>
>
>> When I build and debug this same C++ on macOS, the debugger works fine.
>
>
>> I have verified that target.process.stop-on-sharedlibrary-events is false.
>> I turned on dyld logging and I see lots of log messages about
>> RendezvousBreakpoint being hit, but I don’t see anything that sheds light
>> on why some libraries load without stopping but others don’t.
>
>
>> I have tried to recreate this in a trivial program that calls dlopen in a
>
>
>> loop, but haven’t been able to reproduce.
>
>
>> Can your offer any suggestions for further debugging this? More
>
>
>> supporting evidence follows.
>
>
>> Here is the message when the debugger stops:
>
>
>
>> Process 120004 stopped
>> * thread #1, name = ‘xxxxxxxx', stop reason = trace
>> frame #0: 0x00002aaaacfca6a0 libc.so.6`__restore_rt
>> libc.so.6`__restore_rt:
>> -> 0x2aaaacfca6a0 <+0>: movq $0xf, %rax
>> 0x2aaaacfca6a7 <+7>: syscall
>> 0x2aaaacfca6a9 <+9>: nopl (%rax)
>
>
>
>> libc.so.6`__libc_sigaction:
>> 0x2aaaacfca6b0 <+0>: subq $0xd0, %rsp
>
>
>
>> I do not have the stop on shared library events setting enabled:
>
>
>
>> (lldb) settings show target.process.stop-on-sharedlibrary-events
>> target.process.stop-on-sharedlibrary-events (boolean) = false
>
>
>
>
>
>> The backtrace goes back to dlopen:
>
>
>
>> (lldb) bt
>> * thread #1, name = ‘xxxxx', stop reason = trace
>> * frame #0: 0x00002aaaacfca6a0 libc.so.6`__restore_rt
>> frame #1: 0x00002aaaaaab9eb0 ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
>> frame #2: 0x00002aaaaaabdc53 ld-linux-x86-64.so.2`dl_open_worker + 499
>> frame #3: 0x00002aaaaaab9286 ld-linux-x86-64.so.2`_dl_catch_error +
>
>
>> 102
>
>
>> frame #4: 0x00002aaaaaabd63a ld-linux-x86-64.so.2`_dl_open + 186
>> frame #5: 0x00002aaaac39df66 libdl.so.2`dlopen_doit + 102
>> frame #6: 0x00002aaaaaab9286 ld-linux-x86-64.so.2`_dl_catch_error +
>
>
>> 102
>
>
>> frame #7: 0x00002aaaac39e29c libdl.so.2`_dlerror_run + 124
>> frame #8: 0x00002aaaac39dee1 libdl.so.2`__dlopen_check + 49
>
>
>
>> the dyld debug log has a lot of this:
>> 209 intern-state DynamicLoaderPOSIXDYLD::RendezvousBreakpointHit pid
>
>
>> 153501 stop_when_images_change=false
>
>
>> 210 intern-state DynamicLoaderPOSIXDYLD::RendezvousBreakpointHit
>
>
>> called for pid 153501
>
>
>> 211 intern-state DYLDRendezvous::Resolve address size: 8, padding 4
>> 212 intern-state DYLDRendezvous::Resolve cursor = 0x2aaaaaccc160
>> 213 intern-state DynamicLoaderPOSIXDYLD::RendezvousBreakpointHit pid
>
>
>> 153501 stop_when_images_change=false
>
>
>> 214 intern-state DynamicLoaderPOSIXDYLD::RendezvousBreakpointHit
>
>
>> called for pid 153501
>
>
>> 215 intern-state DYLDRendezvous::Resolve address size: 8, padding 4
>> 216 intern-state DYLDRendezvous::Resolve cursor = 0x2aaaaaccc160
>
>
>
>
>
>> thanks,
>> --steve
>
>
>
>
>> In the woods too, a man casts off his years, as the snake his slough,
>
>
>> and at what period soever of life, is always a child.
>
>
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-...@lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
