[adding lldb-dev back to the conversation] > On Aug 10, 2018, at 2:37 PM, Adrian Prantl <apra...@apple.com> wrote: > > > >> On Aug 10, 2018, at 2:25 PM, Александр Поляков <polyakov....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> I didn't check this yet. lldb-mi already runs LIT test in the --synchronous >> mode and the tests keep failing. >> > > Yes, that's why I said this: > > >>> пт, 10 авг. 2018 г. в 23:57, Adrian Prantl <apra...@apple.com>: >>> >>> Before we continue to discuss -wait-for-breakpoint; where you actually able >>> to verify my suspicion that that is what is happening on the bots? Fred >>> suggested to me offline today that in synchronous mode, perhaps -exec-* >>> should be waiting for the process to be stopped, which would also sound >>> like a reasonable and less invasive solution to the problem. >>> >> > > Instead of adding a new command to wait for the process to be stopped we > might be able to just wait for the process to be stopped if in synchronous > mode and we are running any commands that expect a frame (such as -exec-*). > > -- adrian
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
