On 07/03/2019 20:29, Davide Italiano via lldb-dev wrote:
I'm in favor of this. FWIW, I will be surprised if lldb works at all with that option.
I would actually be also surprised if it works. However, the option I think is important to keep is to be able to build lldb-server without python around. Nobody uses the lldb client on android (in fact, I'm pretty sure it doesn't work), but lldb-server is used there. Getting a working python for android is hard, and it seems counterproductive to ask somebody to do it, when lldb-server does not even use python.
If we can factor the code in such a way that code requiring python is not built/used when building lldb-server, then making python support mandatory for the rest seems reasonable to me.
pl _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
