"Robinson, Paul via Openmp-dev" <openmp-...@lists.llvm.org> writes:
> David Greene, will you be at the LLVM Dev Meeting? If so, could you sign > up for a Round Table session on this topic? Obviously lots to discuss > and concerns to be addressed. That's a great idea. I will be there. I'm also hoping to help run a routable on complex types so we'll need times that don't conflict. What times work well for folks? > (1) Executable tests. These obviously require an execution platform; for > feasibility reasons this means host==target and the guarantee of having > a linker (possibly but not necessarily LLD) and a runtime (possibly but > not necessarily including libcxx). Note that the LLDB tests and the > debuginfo-tests project already have this kind of dependency, and in the > case of debuginfo-tests, this is exactly why it's a separate project. Ok. I'd like to learn more about debuginfo-tests and how they're set up. > (2) Non-executable tests. These are near-identical in character to the > existing clang/llvm test suites and I'd expect lit to drive them. The > only material difference from the majority(*) of existing clang tests is > that they are free to depend on LLVM features/passes. The only difference > from the majority of existing LLVM tests is that they have [Obj]{C,C++} as > their input source language. Right. These are the kinds of tests I've been thinking about. -David _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev