Hi, While working on improving gdbserver compatibility, I've noticed that "sp" is used twice:
1. as an alt_name for esp/rsp register (giving full 32/64-bit stack pointer), 2. and as the name of sp pseudo-register (giving ESP/RSP truncated to 16 bits). FWICS the current lookup logic (at least for LLGS targets) means that 1. takes precedence, i.e. 'register read sp' and 'p $sp' will both resolve to RSP. The 16-bit SP is only visible via 'register read --all'. However, I'm wondering whether this is actually desirable. In particular, should 'sp' generic name take precedence over an actual 'sp' (pseudo-)register? -- Best regards, Michał Górny _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
