I had not considered message classes.
It's a good thought.

What would the class be for a custom command
message? custom response message? I see the
purpose of the command, response, and notification
classes. I'm not sure about custom.

Would the keepalive messages be marked as
being reader initiated rather than client
initiated?

Regards,
   -gww



-----Original Message-----
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Paul Dietrich
Sent:   Fri 9/28/2007 9:12 AM
To:     LLRP Toolkit Development List
Cc:     
Subject:        Re: [ltk-d] Should we indicate response type in llrpdef.xml? 
[heur]

Good idea.  Gordon, are you signing up to check this change in?  I
assume we'd have 4 classes: command, response, notification, custom? 

Let's coordinate on the check-in as I've got the annotation changes (for
LLRP definitions) ready to go.   

Paul



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John R. Hogerhuis
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 12:36 PM
To: LLRP Toolkit Development List
Subject: Re: [ltk-d] Should we indicate response type in llrpdef.xml?
[heur]

I think that's a good idea. I think that relationship can be inferred
from the request and response names, but better not to have to force
such hackery onto the code generators.

-- John.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
llrp-toolkit-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/llrp-toolkit-devel




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
llrp-toolkit-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/llrp-toolkit-devel




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
llrp-toolkit-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/llrp-toolkit-devel

Reply via email to