On 11/4/07, Christian Floerkemeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > John, > > I think this is an excellent idea. In LTKJava, we have been using a single > custom extension that we made up ourselves. The testing process would > definitely benefit from more extensive custom message/parameters > definitions. > > -Christian >
OK, I'll put some thought into a small set of test messages and extensions to exercise the extension facility. If anyone has ideas about particular things to test or test facilities that would be practically useful other than just for testing the extensions, even better. -- John. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ llrp-toolkit-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/llrp-toolkit-devel
