philnik777 wrote: Oh shit. I just realized that this is most likely a latent bug no matter what. We build the module with Clang 18, and then essentially try to load it with Clang 17 (aka Clang Tidy 17). AFAIK that's not guaranteed to work, and probably just happens to work currently with Clang 17 building and Clang 18 loading the module (assuming we even test that right now?). I think we may have to always match the Clang and Clang Tidy versions we use.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76268 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
