AaronBallman wrote: > I'm OK with this kind of change if the AArch64 maintainers are on board. > @AaronBallman Do you have a strong objection to this PR?
We don't typically backport *features* unless there's some strongly compelling case. This sounds like a nice-to-have but I'm not certain why it can't wait for Clang 19 (and have more in-tree time to bake), especially since rc3 is already out the door: https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html#release-patch-rules https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81857 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
