agozillon wrote:

> You could do the renaming of the pass as an NFC PR so it would make the non 
> NFC changes more obvious to spot at. Not necessary to do it for this time but 
> next time it would be nice.

I'm very sorry about that! I didn't realise it would be a problem, but I will 
keep it in mind for the future for any renaming + change sets I aim to 
upstream. Thank you for bringing it up. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82853
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
  • [... via llvm-branch-commits
    • ... via llvm-branch-commits
    • ... Valentin Clement バレンタイン クレメン via llvm-branch-commits
    • ... via llvm-branch-commits
    • ... Valentin Clement バレンタイン クレメン via llvm-branch-commits
    • ... via llvm-branch-commits
    • ... via llvm-branch-commits
    • ... Valentin Clement バレンタイン クレメン via llvm-branch-commits
    • ... via llvm-branch-commits
    • ... Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-branch-commits
    • ... via llvm-branch-commits
    • ... via llvm-branch-commits
    • ... via llvm-branch-commits
    • ... via llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to