bjope wrote: > @bjope What do you think about backporting this?
Thanks! That looks/sounds good to me. (The fault was found when using "-fsanitize=undefined -O0" so it was not as if we were using fuzzy pass pipelines etc to trigger the bug. I guess the special thing was the use of larger BitInt types being used in the test,. Combining two 128-bit shifts would't result in a combined shift amount larger than 255, so larger types than 128 bits would be needed to expose the problem.) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89766 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
