AtariDreams wrote: > @AtariDreams This bug has existed since at least LLVM 10. What makes it a > candidate for backporting?
At best, if the code triggers, we abort the fold, so there is no risk of anything crazy going on if this is added. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91038 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits