zyn0217 wrote: > Is this a major fix or regression fix?
It is a follow-up fix for the previous bug fix incorporated in 19. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/04d20b17050203e07394b4f9ee61b5affe2d5347 But this isn't a regression since clang wasn't working properly in such cases, nor a major fix as I don't think it would affect much but rather ensure more correctness. We have a report from @yuxuanchen1997 that some production codes rely on this to compile, so I think it merits a backport. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106043 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
