================
@@ -970,6 +972,20 @@ void ClauseProcessor::processMapObjects(
}
}
+ if (!mapperIdName.empty()) {
+ if (mapperIdName == "default") {
+ auto &typeSpec = object.sym()->owner().IsDerivedType()
+ ? *object.sym()->owner().derivedTypeSpec()
+ : object.sym()->GetType()->derivedTypeSpec();
----------------
TIFitis wrote:
Yes, the `object.sym()` type is expected to be derivedType here. There is a
check inside `derivedTypeSpec()` just in case.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121001
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
