github-actions[bot] wrote: <!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning: <details> <summary> You can test this locally with the following command: </summary> ``````````bash git-clang-format --diff 45fc89f407b6784a6ef2009e388c5a79b4588455 611b0c1713964a7df8a3f168c4dda69e6f6b63d5 --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilderPipelines.cpp `````````` </details> <details> <summary> View the diff from clang-format here. </summary> ``````````diff diff --git a/llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilderPipelines.cpp b/llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilderPipelines.cpp index 0794729cd4..ed147504c6 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilderPipelines.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Passes/PassBuilderPipelines.cpp @@ -1817,10 +1817,10 @@ PassBuilder::buildLTODefaultPipeline(OptimizationLevel Level, // in the current module. MPM.addPass(CrossDSOCFIPass()); -// MPM.addPass(CoroEarlyPass()); + // MPM.addPass(CoroEarlyPass()); auto Exit = llvm::make_scope_exit([&]() { -// MPM.addPass(CoroCleanupPass()); + // MPM.addPass(CoroCleanupPass()); invokeFullLinkTimeOptimizationLastEPCallbacks(MPM, Level); @@ -1987,8 +1987,8 @@ PassBuilder::buildLTODefaultPipeline(OptimizationLevel Level, // transform it to pass arguments by value instead of by reference. CGSCCPassManager CGPM; CGPM.addPass(ArgumentPromotionPass()); -// CGPM.addPass(CoroSplitPass(Level != OptimizationLevel::O0)); -// CGPM.addPass(CoroAnnotationElidePass()); + // CGPM.addPass(CoroSplitPass(Level != OptimizationLevel::O0)); + // CGPM.addPass(CoroAnnotationElidePass()); MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM))); FunctionPassManager FPM; `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126192 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits