mordante wrote: > This check should be in regular Clang Tidy, using of `std::addressof` actual > not only for libbcpp, any user-writted code might follow the guidline to use > `std::addressof` instead of `operator&` for a generic type. For example, the > Boost library: > https://github.com/boostorg/pfr/blob/f09e6aeae9d050897fff72b93d5f5e866cc5e11a/include/boost/pfr/detail/core_name20_static.hpp#L196 > > Please, look at the issue about it: #121172
As @philnik777 mentioned we like to add checks to our own plugin. Another benefit of our plugin is that the check is available in clang-tidy 19, 20, and HEAD and not just in HEAD. Still I'm open to adding a similar check to the regular Clang Tidy. Then we can remove our own check once all libc++ supported clang-tidy versions have this check. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128366 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
