erichkeane wrote:

FWIW: I'm in favor of this.  This is quite low risk/a pretty trivial change 
that has an incredibly big impact on the memory pressure of our compiler in 
certain situations.  I think this is  a good candidate to back port.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131209
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to