================ @@ -0,0 +1,676 @@ +// RUN: %clang %cflags -march=armv8.3-a %s -o %t.exe +// RUN: llvm-bolt-binary-analysis --scanners=pacret %t.exe 2>&1 | FileCheck %s ---------------- kbeyls wrote:
I'm wondering if the user interface for this should be adapted? `pac-ret` is a widely deployed hardening scheme, so just verifying the correct application of pac-ret hardening is something that users presumably want to do, without also checking pauthabi hardening guarantees that do not exist in pac-ret? Maybe the checking of non-protected indirect calls should happen under a different `--scanners` option? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131899 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits