mizvekov wrote:

@zwuis thanks for finding these.

I removed that assertion because it was not relevant anymore at that point 
where it existed.

However, we should still not have an ElaboratedType in a NestedNameSpecifier, 
although this patch moves us in the direction where that will not be the case 
anymore.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133610
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to