regehr wrote: in C-Reduce we had an inliner. it (and other transformations) routinely increased the code size, but in general these were worthwhile since the eventual reduced test ended up smaller than it otherwise would have.
there's still a legitimate policy question here, which is whether people running reducers want things like inlining to be performed, or whether they're just purely looking to get the irrelevant junk stripped out of test cases. I went with the former thing and generally was happy with the outcomes. ymmv... https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134223 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
