ritter-x2a wrote:
> I think if we add something called "inbounds" to SelectionDAG, it will > inevitably get misused for other purposes, though. Wouldn't we have any problems that would introduce already with inbounds GEPs in the IR? Assuming we introduce ISD::PTRADD and only give inbounds a meaning for those nodes, the situation should be the same as in the middle end, right? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131862 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
