arsenm wrote:

> LGTM.
> 
> 
> 
> Does this mean device library have no code depending on option 
> `-cl-denorms-are-zero`?

It still has a little but it's implementable as a runtime check with dynamic 
denormal mode. I think it would still be better to find a way to avoid it (I 
think we need one weird peephole to do it)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134805
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to