================
@@ -606,6 +644,30 @@
RootSignatureParser::parseDescriptorTableClauseParams(TokenKind RegType) {
return Params;
}
+std::optional<RootSignatureParser::ParsedStaticSamplerParams>
+RootSignatureParser::parseStaticSamplerParams() {
+ assert(CurToken.TokKind == TokenKind::pu_l_paren &&
+ "Expects to only be invoked starting at given token");
+
+ ParsedStaticSamplerParams Params;
+ do {
+ // `s` POS_INT
+ if (tryConsumeExpectedToken(TokenKind::sReg)) {
+ if (Params.Reg.has_value()) {
+ getDiags().Report(CurToken.TokLoc, diag::err_hlsl_rootsig_repeat_param)
+ << CurToken.TokKind;
+ return std::nullopt;
+ }
+ auto Reg = parseRegister();
+ if (!Reg.has_value())
----------------
spall wrote:
what does this case look like? Why is this not a parsing error?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140180
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
