https://github.com/OCHyams updated 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134647

>From 240476a6bcc82d37825aeea626fccf58590495a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams <orlando.hy...@sony.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 19:46:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [KeyInstr][Clang] For range stmt atoms

This patch is part of a stack that teaches Clang to generate Key Instructions
metadata for C and C++.

The Key Instructions project is introduced, including a "quick summary" section
at the top which adds context for this PR, here:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-is-stmt-placement-for-better-interactive-debugging/82668

The feature is only functional in LLVM if LLVM is built with CMake flag
LLVM_EXPERIMENTAL_KEY_INSTRUCTIONs. Eventually that flag will be removed.

The Clang-side work is demoed here:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130943
---
 clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp                  | 13 +++-
 .../DebugInfo/KeyInstructions/for-range.cpp   | 72 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 clang/test/DebugInfo/KeyInstructions/for-range.cpp

diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp
index 65b71c39d86c4..9292be24fc12e 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp
@@ -1477,7 +1477,14 @@ CodeGenFunction::EmitCXXForRangeStmt(const 
CXXForRangeStmt &S,
   if (!Weights && CGM.getCodeGenOpts().OptimizationLevel)
     BoolCondVal = emitCondLikelihoodViaExpectIntrinsic(
         BoolCondVal, Stmt::getLikelihood(S.getBody()));
-  Builder.CreateCondBr(BoolCondVal, ForBody, ExitBlock, Weights);
+  auto *I = Builder.CreateCondBr(BoolCondVal, ForBody, ExitBlock, Weights);
+  // Key Instructions: Emit the condition and branch as separate atoms to
+  // match existing loop stepping behaviour. FIXME: We could have the branch as
+  // the backup location for the condition, which would probably be a better
+  // experience.
+  if (auto *I = dyn_cast<llvm::Instruction>(BoolCondVal))
+    addInstToNewSourceAtom(I, nullptr);
+  addInstToNewSourceAtom(I, nullptr);
 
   if (ExitBlock != LoopExit.getBlock()) {
     EmitBlock(ExitBlock);
@@ -1526,6 +1533,10 @@ CodeGenFunction::EmitCXXForRangeStmt(const 
CXXForRangeStmt &S,
 
   if (CGM.shouldEmitConvergenceTokens())
     ConvergenceTokenStack.pop_back();
+
+  // We want the for closing brace to be step-able on to match existing
+  // behaviour. 
+  addInstToNewSourceAtom(ForBody->getTerminator(), nullptr);
 }
 
 void CodeGenFunction::EmitReturnOfRValue(RValue RV, QualType Ty) {
diff --git a/clang/test/DebugInfo/KeyInstructions/for-range.cpp 
b/clang/test/DebugInfo/KeyInstructions/for-range.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..be71d9fbfb581
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/DebugInfo/KeyInstructions/for-range.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py 
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+// RUN: %clang -gkey-instructions %s -gmlt -S -emit-llvm -o - \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not atomGroup --implicit-check-not 
atomRank
+
+// Perennial quesiton: should the inc be its own source atom or not
+// (currently it is).
+
+// FIXME: See do.c and while.c regarding cmp and cond br groups.
+
+// The stores in the setup (stores to __RANGE1, __BEGIN1, __END1) are all
+// marked as Key. Unclear whether that's desirable. Keep for now as that's
+// least risky.
+
+// Check the conditional branch (and the condition) in FOR_COND and
+// unconditional branch in FOR_BODY are Key Instructions.
+
+struct Range {
+    int *begin();
+    int *end();
+} r;
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: define dso_local void @_Z1av(
+// CHECK-SAME: ) #[[ATTR0:[0-9]+]] !dbg [[DBG10:![0-9]+]] {
+// CHECK-NEXT:  [[ENTRY:.*:]]
+// CHECK-NEXT:    [[__RANGE1:%.*]] = alloca ptr, align 8
+// CHECK-NEXT:    [[__BEGIN1:%.*]] = alloca ptr, align 8
+// CHECK-NEXT:    [[__END1:%.*]] = alloca ptr, align 8
+// CHECK-NEXT:    [[I:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
+// CHECK-NEXT:    store ptr @r, ptr [[__RANGE1]], align 8, !dbg 
[[DBG14:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK-NEXT:    [[CALL:%.*]] = call noundef ptr @_ZN5Range5beginEv(ptr 
noundef nonnull align 1 dereferenceable(1) @r), !dbg [[DBG15:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK-NEXT:    store ptr [[CALL]], ptr [[__BEGIN1]], align 8, !dbg 
[[DBG16:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK-NEXT:    [[CALL1:%.*]] = call noundef ptr @_ZN5Range3endEv(ptr 
noundef nonnull align 1 dereferenceable(1) @r), !dbg [[DBG17:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK-NEXT:    store ptr [[CALL1]], ptr [[__END1]], align 8, !dbg 
[[DBG18:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK-NEXT:    br label %[[FOR_COND:.*]], !dbg [[DBG19:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK:       [[FOR_COND]]:
+// CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP0:%.*]] = load ptr, ptr [[__BEGIN1]], align 8, !dbg 
[[DBG19]]
+// CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP1:%.*]] = load ptr, ptr [[__END1]], align 8, !dbg 
[[DBG19]]
+// CHECK-NEXT:    [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp ne ptr [[TMP0]], [[TMP1]], !dbg 
[[DBG20:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[CMP]], label %[[FOR_BODY:.*]], label 
%[[FOR_END:.*]], !dbg [[DBG21:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK:       [[FOR_BODY]]:
+// CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP2:%.*]] = load ptr, ptr [[__BEGIN1]], align 8, !dbg 
[[DBG19]]
+// CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP3:%.*]] = load i32, ptr [[TMP2]], align 4, !dbg 
[[DBG22:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK-NEXT:    store i32 [[TMP3]], ptr [[I]], align 4, !dbg 
[[DBG23:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK-NEXT:    br label %[[FOR_INC:.*]], !dbg [[DBG24:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK:       [[FOR_INC]]:
+// CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP4:%.*]] = load ptr, ptr [[__BEGIN1]], align 8, !dbg 
[[DBG19]]
+// CHECK-NEXT:    [[INCDEC_PTR:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds nuw i32, ptr 
[[TMP4]], i32 1, !dbg [[DBG25:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK-NEXT:    store ptr [[INCDEC_PTR]], ptr [[__BEGIN1]], align 8, !dbg 
[[DBG26:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK-NEXT:    br label %[[FOR_COND]], !dbg [[DBG19]], !llvm.loop
+// CHECK:       [[FOR_END]]:
+// CHECK-NEXT:    ret void, !dbg [[DBG30:![0-9]+]]
+//
+void a() {
+    for (int i: r)
+        ;
+}
+//.
+// CHECK: [[DBG14]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 1, atomRank: 1)
+// CHECK: [[DBG15]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 2, atomRank: 2)
+// CHECK: [[DBG16]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 2, atomRank: 1)
+// CHECK: [[DBG17]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 3, atomRank: 2)
+// CHECK: [[DBG18]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 3, atomRank: 1)
+// CHECK: [[DBG19]] = !DILocation({{.*}})
+// CHECK: [[DBG20]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 4, atomRank: 1)
+// CHECK: [[DBG21]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 5, atomRank: 1)
+// CHECK: [[DBG22]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 6, atomRank: 2)
+// CHECK: [[DBG23]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 6, atomRank: 1)
+// CHECK: [[DBG24]] = !DILocation({{.*}} atomGroup: 8, atomRank: 1)
+// CHECK: [[DBG25]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 7, atomRank: 2)
+// CHECK: [[DBG26]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 7, atomRank: 1)
+// CHECK: [[DBG30]] = !DILocation({{.*}})
+//.

>From bd77fcbccc223d58becc4364276b8fb92aa56a3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams <orlando.hy...@sony.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 15:52:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cc1 + nits

---
 clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp                       | 2 +-
 clang/test/DebugInfo/KeyInstructions/for-range.cpp | 3 +--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp
index 9292be24fc12e..2696bc9cc379b 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp
@@ -1535,7 +1535,7 @@ CodeGenFunction::EmitCXXForRangeStmt(const 
CXXForRangeStmt &S,
     ConvergenceTokenStack.pop_back();
 
   // We want the for closing brace to be step-able on to match existing
-  // behaviour. 
+  // behaviour.
   addInstToNewSourceAtom(ForBody->getTerminator(), nullptr);
 }
 
diff --git a/clang/test/DebugInfo/KeyInstructions/for-range.cpp 
b/clang/test/DebugInfo/KeyInstructions/for-range.cpp
index be71d9fbfb581..3898942622e89 100644
--- a/clang/test/DebugInfo/KeyInstructions/for-range.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/DebugInfo/KeyInstructions/for-range.cpp
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
-// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py 
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
-// RUN: %clang -gkey-instructions %s -gmlt -S -emit-llvm -o - \
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -gkey-instructions %s -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only 
-emit-llvm -o - \
 // RUN: | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not atomGroup --implicit-check-not 
atomRank
 
 // Perennial quesiton: should the inc be its own source atom or not

_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to