pcc wrote: I thought about it some more and decided to go with your suggested approach anyway. Among other things, #133536 will mean that deactivation symbol support will be needed for the pseudo instruction in order to avoid deactivation symbol relocations being silently dropped, so it's best if everything goes through the same code path.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132857 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
