steakhal wrote: > Do I understand that this document is primarily intended for the _users_ of > the static analyzer? In that case I think it would be important to use the > user-facing names of the checkers that are mentioned (e.g. write > `unix.BlockInCriticalSection` instead of `BlockInCriticalSectionChecker`). > > (I'm willing to implement this change if you agree that it's beneficial.)
Please do. The release notes are primarily for end users, and a tiny bit also for vendors, like CodeChecker or anyone packaging it in some product. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/154600 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
