https://github.com/kasuga-fj updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157086
>From 7678c02d942a548219bbe66cb425a1482b7d9924 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryotaro Kasuga <kasuga.ryot...@fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 11:41:29 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [DA] Add overflow check in ExactSIV --- llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp | 14 +++++++++++++- llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/ExactSIV.ll | 2 +- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp index 0f77a1410e83b..6e576e866b310 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp @@ -1170,6 +1170,15 @@ const SCEVConstant *DependenceInfo::collectConstantUpperBound(const Loop *L, return nullptr; } +/// Returns \p A - \p B if it guaranteed not to signed wrap. Otherwise returns +/// nullptr. \p A and \p B must have the same integer type. +static const SCEV *minusSCEVNoSignedOverflow(const SCEV *A, const SCEV *B, + ScalarEvolution &SE) { + if (SE.willNotOverflow(Instruction::Sub, /*Signed=*/true, A, B)) + return SE.getMinusSCEV(A, B); + return nullptr; +} + // testZIV - // When we have a pair of subscripts of the form [c1] and [c2], // where c1 and c2 are both loop invariant, we attack it using @@ -1626,7 +1635,9 @@ bool DependenceInfo::exactSIVtest(const SCEV *SrcCoeff, const SCEV *DstCoeff, assert(0 < Level && Level <= CommonLevels && "Level out of range"); Level--; Result.Consistent = false; - const SCEV *Delta = SE->getMinusSCEV(DstConst, SrcConst); + const SCEV *Delta = minusSCEVNoSignedOverflow(DstConst, SrcConst, *SE); + if (!Delta) + return false; LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\t Delta = " << *Delta << "\n"); NewConstraint.setLine(SrcCoeff, SE->getNegativeSCEV(DstCoeff), Delta, CurLoop); @@ -1716,6 +1727,7 @@ bool DependenceInfo::exactSIVtest(const SCEV *SrcCoeff, const SCEV *DstCoeff, // explore directions unsigned NewDirection = Dependence::DVEntry::NONE; APInt LowerDistance, UpperDistance; + // TODO: Overflow check may be needed. if (TA.sgt(TB)) { LowerDistance = (TY - TX) + (TA - TB) * TL; UpperDistance = (TY - TX) + (TA - TB) * TU; diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/ExactSIV.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/ExactSIV.ll index 2ee234f270e6d..54166bf5e8a17 100644 --- a/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/ExactSIV.ll +++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/ExactSIV.ll @@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ define void @exact14(ptr %A) { ; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT: Src: store i8 0, ptr %idx.0, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 0, ptr %idx.0, align 1 ; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT: da analyze - none! ; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT: Src: store i8 0, ptr %idx.0, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 1, ptr %idx.1, align 1 -; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT: da analyze - none! +; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT: da analyze - output [*|<]! ; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT: Src: store i8 1, ptr %idx.1, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 1, ptr %idx.1, align 1 ; CHECK-SIV-ONLY-NEXT: da analyze - none! ; _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits