mtrofin wrote: > Final ping. Does anyone have _objections_ to this patch?
It seems very odd to tackle this in the always inliner, as it adds a new concern to a fairly scoped pass. Are you sure there are no alternatives, for instance, having a pre-AlwaysInliner pass to mark off callsites that shouldn't be inlined, and then re-enabling them afterwards? Maybe a RFC would help gather more feedback and consensus? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145613 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
