================
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+; RUN: opt %s -dxil-embed -dxil-globals -S -o - | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: llc %s --filetype=obj -o - | obj2yaml | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DXC
+
+target triple = "dxil-unknown-shadermodel6.0-compute"
+
+; CHECK: @dx.rts0 = private constant [248 x i8] c"{{.*}}", section "RTS0",
align 4
+
+define void @main() #0 {
+entry:
+ ret void
+}
+attributes #0 = { "hlsl.numthreads"="1,1,1" "hlsl.shader"="compute" }
+
+
+!dx.rootsignatures = !{!2} ; list of function/root signature pairs
+!2 = !{ ptr @main, !3, i32 3 } ; function, root signature
+!3 = !{ !5, !6, !7, !8 } ; list of root signature elements
+!5 = !{ !"StaticSampler", i32 4, i32 2, i32 3, i32 5, float
0x3FF6CCCCC0000000, i32 9, i32 3, i32 2, float -1.280000e+02, float
1.280000e+02, i32 42, i32 0, i32 0, i32 1 }
+!6 = !{ !"StaticSampler", i32 4, i32 2, i32 3, i32 5, float
0x3FF6CCCCC0000000, i32 9, i32 3, i32 2, float -1.280000e+02, float
1.280000e+02, i32 43, i32 0, i32 0, i32 2 }
+!7 = !{ !"StaticSampler", i32 4, i32 2, i32 3, i32 5, float
0x3FF6CCCCC0000000, i32 9, i32 3, i32 2, float -1.280000e+02, float
1.280000e+02, i32 44, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0 }
+!8 = !{ !"StaticSampler", i32 4, i32 2, i32 3, i32 5, float
0x3FF6CCCCC0000000, i32 9, i32 3, i32 2, float -1.280000e+02, float
1.280000e+02, i32 45, i32 0, i32 0, i32 3 }
+
+; DXC: - Name: RTS0
+; DXC-NEXT: Size: 248
+; DXC-NEXT: RootSignature:
+; DXC-NEXT: Version: 3
+; DXC-NEXT: NumRootParameters: 0
+; DXC-NEXT: RootParametersOffset: 24
+; DXC-NEXT: NumStaticSamplers: 4
+; DXC-NEXT: StaticSamplersOffset: 24
+; DXC-NEXT: Parameters: []
+; DXC-NEXT: Samplers:
+; DXC-LABEL: ShaderRegister: 42
----------------
inbelic wrote:
nit: I think `DXC-NEXT` is more strict and generally preferred. Is there a
reason to use label over that?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/160210
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
