jthackray wrote: > @jthackray OK, the CI is using the same machines except 16-cores instead of > 32, so it sounds like it could be a coincidence, so don't block your merge on > this failure.
@tstellar - thanks, it's just vanilla assembly/disassembly support for Armv9.7-A, so I can't think of why it should cause an issue, unless the VM was running out of free memory for example (as those VMs presumably have a smaller amount of RAM than mine). Obviously there's a fair bit of new tablegen code and more C++, but I can't think of anything in particular likely to cause an issue. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/163161 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
