================
@@ -667,23 +673,69 @@ template mlir::Value
OpenACCMappableModel<fir::BaseBoxType>::generatePrivateInit(
mlir::Type type, mlir::OpBuilder &builder, mlir::Location loc,
mlir::TypedValue<mlir::acc::MappableType> var, llvm::StringRef varName,
- mlir::ValueRange extents, mlir::Value initVal) const;
+ mlir::ValueRange extents, mlir::Value initVal, bool &needsDestroy) const;
template mlir::Value
OpenACCMappableModel<fir::ReferenceType>::generatePrivateInit(
mlir::Type type, mlir::OpBuilder &builder, mlir::Location loc,
mlir::TypedValue<mlir::acc::MappableType> var, llvm::StringRef varName,
- mlir::ValueRange extents, mlir::Value initVal) const;
+ mlir::ValueRange extents, mlir::Value initVal, bool &needsDestroy) const;
template mlir::Value OpenACCMappableModel<fir::HeapType>::generatePrivateInit(
mlir::Type type, mlir::OpBuilder &builder, mlir::Location loc,
mlir::TypedValue<mlir::acc::MappableType> var, llvm::StringRef varName,
- mlir::ValueRange extents, mlir::Value initVal) const;
+ mlir::ValueRange extents, mlir::Value initVal, bool &needsDestroy) const;
template mlir::Value
OpenACCMappableModel<fir::PointerType>::generatePrivateInit(
mlir::Type type, mlir::OpBuilder &builder, mlir::Location loc,
mlir::TypedValue<mlir::acc::MappableType> var, llvm::StringRef varName,
- mlir::ValueRange extents, mlir::Value initVal) const;
+ mlir::ValueRange extents, mlir::Value initVal, bool &needsDestroy) const;
+
+template <typename Ty>
+bool OpenACCMappableModel<Ty>::generatePrivateDestroy(
+ mlir::Type type, mlir::OpBuilder &builder, mlir::Location loc,
+ mlir::Value privatized) const {
+ // TODO: This is only dealing with cleaning-up heap allocation of the
+ // variable when any was made. Some Fortran types may have allocatable
+ // components. Currently the init is not doing deep copies of such
components,
+ // so they are not freed here either. Likewise, the copies, when any, are not
+ // made using Fortran user defined assignments, so the destructors are not
----------------
razvanlupusoru wrote:
This is an implementation limitation. Any chance you can add a TODO in lowering
for such a case?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162702
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
